Skip to content

Epidaurus · Treatment Guide · Alternative & Complementary Medicine


Going abroad for —

Integrative Oncology Quality

Quality of integrative cancer treatment programs

The country comparison

Which countries are best for integrative oncology quality

The destinations ranked high→low under this lens — each with the reasoning behind its score, the cited evidence one click down, and its full report. The verdict is free; the report is the depth.

19 / 19 Countries ranked

Researched and assessed by the Epidaurus editorial pipeline against our published scale. A country below the rule is not yet assessed enough — never ranked last.

  1. 1 United States US 5.0/5 Good The United States unequivocally meets all criteria for Score 5 (Excellent) in integrative oncology quality. The country hosts multiple world-class cancer centers (MD Anderson, Memorial Sloan Kettering, Dana-Farber, Ci... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 10 cited points
    • Memorial Sloan Kettering, MD Anderson, and Dana-Farber have been building integrative oncology clinical models for almost 20 years [Putting Integrative Oncology Into Practice - PMC - 2019 - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6333385/]
    • Majority of NCI-designated cancer centers offer acupuncture (73%), massage (73%), meditation (69%), and yoga (69%), with 91% offering nutrition counseling [Putting Integrative Oncology Into Practice - PMC - 2019 - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6333385/]
    • SIO Clinical Practice Guidelines are the only comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for incorporating complementary and integrative therapies into conventional oncology [SIO Practice Guidelines - Society for Integrative Oncology - 2024 - https://integrativeonc.org/practice-guidelines/]
    • ASCO endorsement in 2018 by largest professional organization for oncologists with 50,000+ members [SIO-ASCO Joint Guidelines Overview - Liebertpub - 2024 - https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/jicm.2024.0452]
    • First Integrative Medicine in Hematology Oncology (IMHO) fellowship program launched in 2022 with accreditation in 2024 [Integrative Oncology Fellowship Training - PubMed - 2025 - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40366602/]
    • City of Hope's Cherng Family Center funded by transformative $100 million gift, designed to conduct 100+ research studies, deliver 60,000+ integrative oncology visits [Cherng Family Center - City of Hope - 2024 - https://www.cityofhope.org/locations/los-angeles/departments-and-services/supportive-care-medicine/cherng-center]
    • Memorial Sloan Kettering's Integrative Medicine Service leading field in patient-centered research since 1999, studying how therapies reduce cancer treatment side effects [Integrative Medicine and Wellness Service - Memorial Sloan Kettering - 2024 - https://www.mskcc.org/departments/medicine/division-supportive-and-acute-care-services/integrative-medicine-wellness-service]
    • Comprehensive safety protocols including About Herbs library providing objective information on supplement risks/benefits [Integrative Medicine and Wellness Service - Memorial Sloan Kettering - 2024 - https://www.mskcc.org/departments/medicine/division-supportive-and-acute-care-services/integrative-medicine-wellness-service]
    • Board-certified physicians provide integrative oncology consultation with expertise in both oncology and integrative medicine [Integrative Medicine Clinical Services - MD Anderson - 2024 - https://www.mdanderson.org/patients-family/diagnosis-treatment/care-centers-clinics/integrative-medicine-center/clinical-services.html]
    • NCCN Guidelines recommend acupuncture for pain, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and hot flashes with 80%+ of NCI-designated centers recommending acupuncture [NCCN Integrative Oncology Guidelines - 2024]

    Read the full United States report →

  2. 2 Singapore SG 4.0/5 Good Singapore earns a score of 4 (Good) for integrative oncology quality. The National Cancer Centre Singapore operates a formal Integrative Oncology Clinic delivering evidence-based complementary therapies under oncologi... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 10 cited points
    • NCCS operates a formal Integrative Oncology Clinic within its Department of Medical Oncology, offering acupuncture, mind-body therapies, lifestyle guidance, and coordinated TCM under oncologist referral
    • HERBAL randomized controlled trial testing TCM formula for cancer-related fatigue was completed and published in Integrative Cancer Therapies (2025)
    • MOH launched TCM Integrative Sandbox in January 2025 with 18 proposals from all three public healthcare clusters, including acupuncture for chemotherapy-induced side effects and palliative cancer care
    • NCCS maintains Traditional Medicine Information Service (TMIS) to assist oncologists in assessing herb-chemotherapy interactions
    • Parkway Cancer Centre's CanHOPE provides dedicated oncology dietitians, psychological counseling, palliative care support, and cancer rehabilitation across four hospitals
    • TCM practitioners in Singapore are regulated by the Traditional Chinese Medicine Practitioners Board with mandatory registration, recognized qualifications, and continuing professional education requirements
    • NCCS hosted Integrative Oncology Symposium in February 2025 with international collaboration including Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    • 46-51% of Singapore cancer patients using CAM do not inform their oncologist, indicating unresolved safety gaps in patient communication
    • Multiple institutions offer complementary therapies: NCCS, Parkway Cancer Centre, Thomson Medical, Raffles Chinese Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, and KK Women's and Children's Hospital
    • Singapore is a major medical tourism destination with English-speaking staff, dedicated international patient coordinators, multilingual services, and post-treatment care coordination through CanHOPE's network of 20 international cities

    Read the full Singapore report →

  3. 3 Japan JP 4.0/5 Good Japan earns a Score 4 (Good) for well-established integrative oncology services across multiple institutions. The country uniquely integrates Kampo (traditional Japanese herbal medicine) directly into physician-superv... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 10 cited points
    • ESMO accreditation of two major hospitals (National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba Cancer Center) for integrated oncology and palliative care — first Japanese institutions so recognized
    • 92.4% of designated cancer hospital physicians prescribe Kampo; 73.5% specifically for cancer patients — among highest globally for physician-supervised integrative oncology
    • National Health Insurance covers 148 approved Kampo formulas, enabling no-cost integrative supportive care alongside chemotherapy for domestic and insured international patients
    • JASCC clinical guidelines (2020) with randomized controlled trial evidence for specific indications: Hangeshashinto for irinotecan-induced diarrhea, Goshajinkigan for paclitaxel neuropathy, Rikkunshito for anorexia
    • Kampo exclusively prescribed by licensed physicians receiving mandatory medical school training since 2001 — unique international model of physician-supervised integrative medicine
    • Formal integrative oncology departments/divisions at Cancer Institute Hospital Tokyo, Tohoku University Hospital, and multiple university hospitals with dedicated staffing
    • Mandatory palliative care (including psychosocial support) from diagnosis under Cancer Control Act 2007; registered dietitians at all 390+ designated cancer hospitals
    • 14-year nationwide cohort analysis (2010-2023) demonstrating 13.6% overall Kampo utilization in cancer hospitalizations, up to 25.1% in irinotecan-treated patients
    • Acupuncture in palliative care teams with documented efficacy in symptom management (pain, nausea, edema, stiffness, breathlessness) demonstrated in prospective studies
    • Published cancer survivorship guidelines for exercise and physical activity (2025); mindfulness-based meditation programs with demonstrated anxiety and depression reduction

    Read the full Japan report →

  4. 4 Israel IL 4.0/5 Good Israel exceeds Score 4 criteria with ten active integrative oncology programs across cancer centers nationwide, including seven led by board-certified integrative physicians. Two centers hold ESMO Designated Centre st... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 12 cited points
    • Ten active integrative oncology programs across Israeli cancer centers with geographic distribution spanning north (Rambam, Lin, B'nai Zion), central (Sheba, Meir, Rabin), and Jerusalem (Hadassah)
    • ESMO Designated Centre of Integrated Oncology and Palliative Care status at both Rambam Health Care Campus and Davidoff Cancer Center (Rabin Medical Center)
    • Board-certified integrative physician leadership: Dr. Ofer Caspi (Davidoff, trained 7 years at Univ. of Arizona/China), Dr. Moshe Frenkel (Rambam since 2019), Dr. Eran Ben-Arye (Lin/Carmel/Zebulun)
    • SIO-ASCO integrative oncology and pain guideline endorsed by nine IMA-affiliated medical societies including Israeli Society of Clinical Oncology & Radiation Therapy
    • Comprehensive services including acupuncture, massage, reflexology, shiatsu, yoga, Qi Gong, meditation, nutritional counseling, and mind-body therapies across treatment phases
    • Davidoff Cancer Center Supportive Care Division staffing: 12 dieticians, 11 social workers, 3 psychologists, 1 psychiatrist, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, and large CAM unit
    • Systematic drug-herb safety research: published study of 305 patients monitoring herbal-chemotherapy interactions at Israeli IO consultations with 50.5% herbal use disclosure
    • National 110-hour multidisciplinary integrative oncology training program endorsed by Israel Medical Association for physicians, nurses, and therapists
    • Multiple active ClinicalTrials.gov-registered studies including wartime IO research (NCT06604455) and hospital-to-community acupuncture (NCT06590766)
    • Prof. Eran Ben-Arye serves as Society for Integrative Oncology (SIO) Regional Ambassador to Europe and the Middle East
    • 40-60% of Israeli cancer patients on active treatment utilize complementary and integrative approaches
    • Sheba Medical Center Global Patient Services supports patients from 100+ countries with multilingual coordinators and structured international patient programs

    Read the full Israel report →

  5. 5 Germany DE 4.0/5 Good Germany operates 5+ major integrative oncology institutions (KEM Essen, MHH Hannover, NCT Heidelberg, Charité CCCTIM, GKH Havelhöhe) with formal departments and board-certified integrative medicine physicians. It has ... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 10 cited points
    • Five major cancer centers with formal integrative oncology departments: Kliniken Essen-Mitte, MHH Hannover, NCT Heidelberg, Charité CCCTIM Berlin, GKH Havelhöhe
    • 2021 S3 Guideline on Complementary Medicine in Oncology with 155 evidence-based recommendations from 72 experts across 46 specialist societies
    • Kliniken Essen-Mitte independently ranked alongside MD Anderson as one of only two facilities globally operating at highest integrative oncology level
    • 14-institution KIM Baden-Württemberg network with published expert consensus on symptom management
    • Mistletoe (Viscum album) approved as drug (not supplement) in Germany with 150+ clinical studies supporting its use
    • Active clinical research: PRIO Registry (CCC Ulm 2024), OCEAnic systematic review (Charité 2025), YogMedAcht pediatric trial, published outcomes from Klaus Bahlsen Center
    • Prof. Holger Cramer holds Germany's first endowed chair in complementary medicine, chairs S3 guideline, serves as ISCMR president and Journal editor
    • Multiple major centers offer comprehensive services: acupuncture, massage therapy, mind-body medicine, nutritional counseling, music therapy, palliative care integration
    • Drug-supplement interaction screening protocols implemented at specialist centers (KEM, NCT, GKH); however CONKO 022 data shows only 36.6% of German cancer patients receive interaction counseling nationally
    • English-language services and international patient coordination available at major centers; Germany receives 250,000+ international patients annually; but most integrative services not covered by statutory insurance

    Read the full Germany report →

  6. 6 United Kingdom GB 4.0/5 Good The United Kingdom has established integrative oncology services across multiple institutions with strong institutional depth and international recognition. Three institutions hold ESMO Designated Centre accreditation... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 12 cited points
    • ESMO Designated Centre status: Three UK institutions hold ESMO Designated Centre for Integrated Oncology and Palliative Care accreditation—The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, and HCA Healthcare UK
    • Pioneering NHS service: The Christie's Complementary Health and Wellbeing service has operated since 1997 with approximately 20 therapists across three sites, offering oncology massage, reflexology, acupuncture, and hypnotherapy free of charge
    • Dual-trained physicians: UCLH's Integrated Cancer Care Service employs doctors with both conventional and complementary medicine training working within multidisciplinary oncology teams
    • Professional infrastructure: British Society for Integrative Oncology (BSIO, founded 2011) promotes SIO-ASCO guideline adherence; National Centre for Integrative Oncology (NCIO) provides additional organisational depth
    • Comprehensive services: Acupuncture, massage, nutritional counseling, mind-body programmes (yoga, tai chi, meditation), aromatherapy, reflexology, physiotherapy, psychological support documented across multiple institutions
    • Credentialing standards: NHS services require CNHC registration for practitioners; acupuncturists hold British Acupuncture Council (BAcC) registration; Synthesis Clinic is CQC-registered and LegitScript-certified
    • Evidence-based practice: Programmes document protocols for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), pain, anxiety, fatigue, and hot flushes aligned with clinical evidence
    • Research activity: 2024 peer-reviewed retrospective evaluation of Christie's CHW service published in European Journal of Integrative Medicine; Professor Robert Thomas at UCLH publishes on nutritional oncology; Synthesis Clinic presents at SIO and ESMO conferences
    • Academic training: Christie's Integrative Therapies Training Unit has trained practitioners for 20+ years; NCIM Ofqual-regulated Level 7 Extended Diploma in Integrative Healthcare launched January 2024
    • Medical tourism limitation: Leading private integrative oncology clinics (Synthesis Clinic, Quantum Clinic) explicitly restrict services to UK residents; most NHS integrative services accessible only within the NHS system
    • Sustainability concerns: 2024 evaluation of Christie's CHW service identified the service operating 'at full capacity with sustainability concerns,' relying on charitable funding rather than core NHS commissioning
    • Geographic variation: While London and Manchester have well-developed integrative oncology services, provision is patchier elsewhere; some Integrated Care Boards adopt restrictive policies on commissioning complementary therapies

    Read the full United Kingdom report →

  7. 7 Thailand TH 4.0/5 Good Thailand merits a score of 4 (Good) based on multiple formal integrative oncology programs at established cancer centers with strong medical supervision and exceptional medical tourism infrastructure. Bumrungrad's Esp... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 10 cited points
    • Bumrungrad's Esperance Integrative Cancer Clinic named Best Integrated Cancer Medical Centre in APAC 2023 with multidisciplinary teams including oncologists, integrative physicians, nutritionists, and psycho-oncology experts
    • Multiple institutional programs at Chulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok Hospital, and Samitivej Hospital offering formal integrative oncology services combining conventional treatment with acupuncture, yoga, meditation, and nutritional counseling
    • Comprehensive service availability including acupuncture, meditation, nutritional counseling, mind-body practices, yoga, massage, psychological counseling, pain management, and physical therapy
    • Board-certified oncologists internationally trained with credentials from American Board of Internal Medicine, European Society for Medical Oncology, and American Institute of Integrative Oncology
    • Robust medical tourism infrastructure with over 2 million international patients annually, English-speaking staff, 50-70% cost savings compared to Western countries, and dedicated international patient coordinators
    • JCI accreditation at major hospitals (Bumrungrad, Samitivej, Bangkok Hospital) ensuring adherence to international quality standards
    • Multidisciplinary team approach with diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, surgical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists collaborating on treatment plans
    • Published research demonstrating 60.9% prevalence of complementary medicine use among Thai cancer patients with 51% reporting positive effects
    • International collaborations through Thai Society of Clinical Oncology participating in Asian Clinical Trials network with Vietnam, Malaysia, Philippines, Indonesia, and National Cancer Centre Japan
    • Exceptional medical tourism infrastructure with comprehensive services including visa assistance, accommodation arrangements, and post-treatment follow-up

    Read the full Thailand report →

  8. 8 South Korea KR 3.5/5 Moderate South Korea exhibits moderate-to-good integrative oncology quality with strong institutional infrastructure but significant integration limitations. The country has government-established integrative medical centers, ... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 10 cited points
    • Government-established integrative medical centers in 2019 including Daegu Jeon In, Won Kwang University, and Chungju Widam hospitals providing formal integrative oncology programs
    • Board-certified integrative oncology education program launched by KSIO in 2018 with 20-40 hour curriculum covering oncology-specific training
    • Active research programs at Gachon University (since 2003), Korea University, Ajou University, and Daejeon/Kyunghee Universities with government funding support
    • Insurance coverage for acupuncture, herbal medicine, and physical therapy in integrated settings where both therapies received on same day are covered
    • Weak inter-system coordination: Western doctors cannot prescribe Oriental medicines and Oriental doctors cannot diagnose using Western devices, creating functional separation
    • 4.8% of cancer patients experienced adverse effects from CAM including hepatotoxicity and renal toxicity with inadequate standardized drug-supplement interaction screening
    • KSIO President serves as Society for Integrative Oncology Board Member with Korean practitioners participating in international conferences
    • Excellent medical tourism infrastructure with 11,226 international cancer patients visiting Korea in 2019 (45% increase) and 40-70% cost savings versus Western countries
    • Most clinical evidence from retrospective case reports or case series rather than well-designed prospective clinical trials testing integrative interventions
    • Significant discrepancy between patient and oncologist expectations regarding integrative therapy efficacy, indicating communication gaps between medical systems

    Read the full South Korea report →

  9. 9 United Arab Emirates AE 3.0/5 Moderate The UAE qualifies as Moderate (3) for integrative oncology quality. One flagship institution—Burjeel Cancer Institute—provides formally structured integrative oncology with ESMO accreditation, a FABNO-certified naturo... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 10 cited points
    • Burjeel Cancer Institute is the first and only ESMO-accredited Designated Centre of Integrated Oncology and Palliative Care in the UAE and MENA region [Burjeel Cancer Institute, Burjeel Medical City - ESMO - 2024]
    • Dr. Heidi Kussmann ND FABNO at Burjeel is the only FABNO-certified naturopathic oncologist in the UAE and MENA region, with documented drug-supplement interaction screening and tumor board integration [Dr. Heidi Kussmann - Burjeel Medical City - 2024]
    • Burjeel's naturopathic oncology offers botanical medicine, clinical nutrition, acupuncture, IV therapies, hyperbaric oxygen, and lifestyle counseling coordinated with conventional oncology [Integrative Oncology Care in Abu Dhabi - Burjeel Medical City - 2024]
    • Burjeel's palliative care team achieved 92% of oncology patients reporting ≥30% pain reduction within 48 hours, with integrative modalities including aromatherapy, massage, music therapy, and mindfulness [Palliative and Supportive Care - Burjeel Medical City - 2024]
    • Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi opened a new cancer center (March 2023) with a Comprehensive Lifestyle Medicine Program for cancer patients, the first of its kind in the region [Cleveland Clinic Newsroom - March 2023]
    • A peer-reviewed 2022 assessment found 'integrative oncology is a new specialty in the UAE, with no cancer center providing this unique service within their centers,' a gap only partially addressed by Burjeel since [The State of Cancer Care in the United Arab Emirates - PMC - 2022]
    • No integrative oncology-specific clinical trials have been identified in the UAE; only 25 oncology clinical trials overall were registered as of 2022 [Barriers and Facilitators to Conducting Oncology Clinical Trials in the UAE - PMC - 2022]
    • Only 5 of 33 cancer centers in the UAE have active research units, limiting generation of locally validated evidence [Barriers and Facilitators to Conducting Oncology Clinical Trials in the UAE - PMC - 2022]
    • Independent clinics (Novomed, KindCare, Wellth) offer naturopathic oncology services but operate outside hospital oncology systems without documented oncologist coordination [Novomed, KindCare, Wellth - Dubai - 2024]
    • The UAE's DHA and DOH regulatory framework licenses TCAM practitioners including naturopaths and acupuncturists, ensuring basic credentialing standards [Alternative Medicine - UAE Government Official Portal - 2024]

    Read the full United Arab Emirates report →

  10. 10 Brazil BR 3.0/5 Moderate Brazil's integrative oncology landscape features multiple well-resourced private institutions (Hospital Albert Einstein with ACIMH membership, AC Camargo, Oncoclínicas' 140-unit network) offering physician-supervised ... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 10 cited points
    • Hospital Albert Einstein became first Latin American institution accepted into Academic Consortium for Integrative Medicine & Health (ACIMH) in 2024, joining Mayo Clinic and Johns Hopkins
    • Oncoclínicas Group operates 140+ integrative medicine units in 40 Brazilian cities with physician-led care coordination, exclusive Dana-Farber Cancer Institute partnership
    • ICESP published peer-reviewed study demonstrating 63.6% symptom reduction in 183 cancer patients receiving acupuncture for pain, neuropathy, and chemotherapy toxicity
    • CFN formally recognizes Clinical Nutrition in Oncology as specialty; SBNO issues oncology dietitian credentials demonstrating credentialing infrastructure
    • 83.7% of Brazilian cancer patients never disclose complementary medicine use to physicians; 46.2% because physicians never ask—indicating systemic drug-interaction screening failure
    • Integrative practices in Brazil's public SUS concentrated ~78% in primary care with only ~4% in hospital oncology settings; INCA has not formalized integrative oncology programs
    • Einstein postgraduate program in Integrative Health operating since 2013 (sixth cohort); Brazilian researchers contribute to SIO 2025 Global Committee
    • Multiple private institutions (Einstein, AC Camargo, Sírio-Libanês, Hospital de Câncer de Mato Grosso) offer formalized programs with physician oversight and multidisciplinary integration
    • Credentialing standards for non-dietitian integrative practitioners remain variable and insufficiently transparent across institutions
    • Formal adherence to SIO or NCCN integrative oncology clinical practice guidelines not publicly documented at most Brazilian institutions

    Read the full Brazil report →

  11. 11 Spain ES 3.0/5 Moderate Spain merits a moderate score of 3, with genuine institutional programs offset by systemic barriers and uneven distribution. The country has 3 ESMO-designated ICO palliative care centres, Spain's first published integ... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 10 cited points
    • ESMO Designated Centres: Institut Català d'Oncologia holds accreditation across 3 sites (L'Hospitalet, Girona, Badalona) since 2007, with WHO Collaborative Centre status for palliative care
    • Published integrative paediatric research: SJD Barcelona IPOU published January 2025 MDPI Cancers study documenting 433 patients with 94.7% acupuncture, 100% aromatherapy, 96.1% reflexology acceptance
    • Public hospital program: Hospital La Paz launched Integral Oncological Unit in 2023–2024, serving 300+ patients with yoga, art therapy, nutrition, and psycho-oncology
    • Private sector leadership: HC Marbella's integrative unit led by MSK-trained medical oncologist with endorsement from MSK's Director of Integrated Medicine; 75% international patient base
    • Evidence-based guidelines: SJD Barcelona and Onconature explicitly follow SIO/ASCO guidelines for complementary therapy integration
    • Academic infrastructure: Catholic University of Murcia Expert University Programme in Integrative Oncology, SESMI Masters programme, SESMI organized 2024 European Congress of Integrative Medicine in Madrid with 40+ institutions
    • Government opposition: Spain's Ministry of Health developing 'Plan for the Protection of Health against Pseudotherapies' backed by 400 physicians, constraining program development
    • No public reimbursement: Integrative services not covered by Spain's national health system; 60–88% of cancer patients use complementary therapies outside supervised medical settings
    • Safety gaps: No documented systematic drug-supplement interaction screening protocols across Spanish integrative oncology programs, despite high chemotherapy complexity
    • Limited adult programs: Most published institutional research focuses on pediatrics; adult integrative oncology at institutional level is more limited in scope and evidence base

    Read the full Spain report →

  12. 12 India IN 3.0/5 Moderate India's integrative oncology landscape merits a moderate score (3) based on multiple emerging programs balanced against significant structural limitations. While the country demonstrates noteworthy developments—includ... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 10 cited points
    • Government-backed flagship program: Ministry of AYUSH inaugurated India's first Integrative Oncology Research and Care Centre at AIIA Goa in 2024 in collaboration with Government of Goa and ACTREC of Tata Memorial Center
    • Multiple institutional programs: Private hospitals including Sri Shankara-AyurVAID Centre for Integrative Oncology (Bangalore), Indian Institute of Integrative Oncology (Nashik), ZenOnco.io, and major chains (Fortis, Aster CMI, Manipal) offer integrative oncology services
    • Evidence gap: Report documents 'paucity of documented evidence of integrative practices in oncology settings and urgent need for generating evidence through well-designed studies'
    • Inconsistent credentialing standards: Southern states (AP, Telangana, Karnataka, Kerala) regulate Y&N practitioners; no such regulations exist in central and north states where acupuncture is practiced by both licensed physicians and nonlicensed individuals
    • Absent systematic safety protocols: No evidence of widespread drug-supplement interaction screening systems or standardized contraindication assessments across Indian programs
    • Variable medical supervision: Some programs coordinate with patient oncologists, dietitians, and physiotherapists; coordination described as informal and inconsistent across facilities
    • International research collaboration: Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences signed 2020 Letter of Intent with U.S. NIH-National Cancer Institute Office of Cancer Complementary and Alternative Medicine
    • Limited outcome tracking: Minimal evidence of systematic patient-reported outcome measurement or quality-of-life tracking across programs
    • Strong medical tourism infrastructure: Multilingual staff, international patient coordinators, visa support, follow-up care protocols, and 50-90% lower costs than Western countries
    • Large patient volume: Multi-centric projects across India have treated more than 14,000 cancer patients by 2022, providing substantial clinical experience

    Read the full India report →

  13. 13 Malaysia MY 3.0/5 Moderate Malaysia demonstrates basic-to-moderate integrative oncology services with formal integration at leading institutions but significant gaps across the broader healthcare system. Sunway Medical Centre's ESMO Designated ... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 8 cited points
    • Sunway Medical Centre holds continuous ESMO Designated Centre of Integrated Oncology and Palliative Care accreditation (2018–2027), one of only a handful of Southeast Asian facilities with this distinction
    • Four MOH public hospitals (National Cancer Institute, Hospital Kepala Batas, Hospital Sultan Ismail, Hospital Wanita & Kanak-Kanak Sabah) operate formal cancer-specific integrative T&CM programs with mandatory oncologist referral before patient treatment
    • T&CM Act 2013 mandates practitioner registration for all T&CM providers in healthcare facilities (effective March 2021), creating a formal credentialing framework
    • Dr. Lim Ren Jye (Sunway TCM Medical Director) holds Western medical degree, Master's degree in TCM, and PhD in TCM Oncology (2018) with published clinical research on TCM for radiation side effects
    • Critical safety gap: 46–61% of Malaysian cancer patients use CAM during treatment, but only 43–57% disclose to physicians and only 33.7% of oncologists proactively ask about CAM use
    • Integration is inconsistent across private healthcare system—most hospitals offer supportive services (nutrition, palliative care) but lack formal interdisciplinary tumor board protocols or structured integration
    • Limited infrastructure for evidence-based mind-body medicine programs (mindfulness-based stress reduction, yoga, meditation) compared to higher-tier integrative oncology centers
    • No documented institutional adoption of Society for Integrative Oncology (SIO) or NCCN integrative medicine clinical practice guidelines at Malaysian hospitals

    Read the full Malaysia report →

  14. 14 Colombia CO 2.0/5 Poor Colombia scores 2 (Poor) on integrative oncology quality. While Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá and Hospital Internacional de Colombia offer some complementary modalities (acupuncture, yoga, mindfulness) within cancer ca... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 10 cited points
    • Only 2 institutions (FSFB, HIC) have any formal integrative oncology programs; other major cancer centers offer only conventional supportive care
    • 51.7% of Colombian cancer patients use CAM, but 68% learn about it from family/friends rather than medical teams; physicians recommended CAM in only 8% of cases
    • No Colombian cancer center has documented adherence to SIO or NCCN integrative medicine clinical practice guidelines
    • No documented drug-supplement interaction screening protocols or oncology-specific credentialing standards for complementary practitioners
    • Most frequently used CAM products in Colombia (soursop, herbal preparations, transfer factors) have 'little scientific support' per 2023 multicenter study
    • Cancer survivorship care described as 'in its infancy'; no national policy or institution-based programs for post-treatment survivors
    • No evidence of Colombian institutions participating in ClinicalTrials.gov integrative oncology trials or publishing in SIO-associated journals
    • Private practitioners offer high-dose IV vitamin C and mistletoe outside hospital oversight, creating coordination risks
    • Integrative services concentrated in major cities (Bogotá, Medellín, Cali, Bucaramanga); unavailable across broader oncology network
    • Medical tourism infrastructure exists for general cancer care but no hospital explicitly markets integrative oncology packages to international patients

    Read the full Colombia report →

  15. 15 Poland PL 2.0/5 Poor Poland provides basic evidence-based supportive services—psycho-oncology, clinical nutrition, and physical rehabilitation—at flagship institutions like NIO Warsaw and WCO Poznań, but lacks formal integrative oncology ... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 10 cited points
    • NIO Warsaw Psycho-Oncology Clinic: 31-member specialist team providing evidence-based psychotherapy, established 2011, free to NFZ patients [Poradnia Psychoonkologii - Narodowy Instytut Onkologii - 2024 - https://nio.gov.pl/pacjent/kliniki-zaklady-pracownie-i-poradnie/poradnie/poradnia-psychoonkologii/]
    • No formal integrative oncology departments: None of Poland's cancer centers operates a documented integrative oncology department with clinical protocols integrating complementary therapies into conventional treatment [Detailed Analysis - Polish cancer center websites and research review - 2026]
    • CAM non-disclosure rate 60–80%: Multicenter Silesian cohort (n=864) found 60% of CAM users concealed use from oncologists entirely, indicating structural absence of supervised integration [Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use in Hospitalized Cancer Patients—Study from Silesia, Poland - PMC - 2022 - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8835686/]
    • No acupuncture in oncology: No documented acupuncture service within any major hospital oncology department [Report analysis - 2026 - https://medical/reports/research/pl/integrative_oncology_quality.md]
    • No drug-supplement interaction screening: No documented protocol at any Polish cancer center for screening interactions between chemotherapy and herbal/supplement therapies [Detailed Analysis - Medical Supervision and Safety Systems - 2026]
    • Physician skepticism barrier: Survey of Polish senior and junior doctors found 95% believe alternative medicine is dangerous; physicians unwilling to recommend CAM, discouraging open dialogue [Polish physicians' attitudes to complementary and alternative medicine - ScienceDirect - 2016 - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0965229916300577]
    • No SIO/NCCN guideline implementation: Despite awareness of guidelines, no major Polish cancer center has published documented clinical protocols implementing Society for Integrative Oncology or NCCN integrative medicine guidelines [Evidence-Based Practice and Clinical Protocols - 2026]
    • Medical tourism infrastructure absent: No cancer center markets integrative oncology services to international patients; no structured English-language access to complementary care programs [Medical Tourism Implications - 2026]
    • Rehabilitation services present: NIO Gliwice operates a comprehensive Rehabilitation Workshop with kinesiotherapy, manual lymphatic drainage, occupational therapy, and group relaxation training [Pracownia Rehabilitacyjna - NIO Gliwice - 2024 - https://gliwice.nio.gov.pl/dla-pacjenta/lecznictwo-i-diagnostyka/lecznictwo/pracownia-rehabilitacyjna/]
    • Emerging research limited: Onco-Move RCT (n=40, Gdansk University) pilots supervised exercise for cancer survivors but does not constitute integrative oncology research program [Onco Move - ClinicalTrials.gov - 2025 - https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07087652]

    Read the full Poland report →

  16. 16 Jordan JO 2.0/5 Poor Jordan receives a Score 2 (Poor) on integrative oncology quality. While KHCC provides genuine supportive care services including creative therapies, oncology nutrition counseling, psychosocial support, and palliative ... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 8 cited points
    • KHCC is Jordan's only cancer center with complementary services; creative therapies, nutrition unit (9 dietitians), psychosocial support, and palliative care are available but not formally integrated as an 'integrative oncology' program
    • No formal integrative oncology department or evidence-based clinical protocols documented; programs do not follow SIO, NCCN, or ASCO integrative medicine guidelines
    • Critical safety gap: no systematic drug-supplement interaction screening despite herbal medicine use in 27–35% of KHCC cancer patients; 85% of users reported providers never discussed risks
    • KHCC oncologists have 'very little knowledge' of CAM; only 17% understand herbal composition; 84% define CAM as 'not evidence-based'
    • Missing evidence-based modalities: acupuncture for chemotherapy-induced nausea, mindfulness-based stress reduction, yoga, and structured mind-body interventions are not documented as KHCC services
    • Regional review confirms Jordan 'lacks established IO services within oncology centers' in contrast to regional comparators like Israel with ten active IO programs
    • Medical tourism infrastructure is robust for conventional cancer care but integrative oncology services are not marketed or packaged for international patients
    • No clinical trials testing integrative oncology interventions documented in public registries; integrative oncology training programs not implemented despite planned curriculum inclusion

    Read the full Jordan report →

  17. 17 Hungary HU 2.0/5 Poor Hungary merits a score of 2 (Poor) for integrative oncology quality. While the country has established psycho-oncology services and a regulatory framework for acupuncture, there are no institutional integrative oncolo... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 10 cited points
    • No formal integrative oncology department at National Institute of Oncology (OOI), Hungary's flagship OECI-accredited cancer center treating 16,000 patients annually
    • Only 7% of Hungarian surgeons and anaesthesiologists use CAM clinically, versus 24-58% in comparable international surveys
    • Drug-supplement interaction screening absent from oncology practice despite 80.2% of Semmelweis oncology patients consuming bioactive foods/supplements that could interact with chemotherapy
    • Only 25% of herbal medicine users in Hungarian surgical cohort disclosed use to physicians
    • Complementary therapies available exclusively through private practices, not covered by public insurance, not integrated with hospital oncology teams
    • No Hungarian cancer center documented as following Society for Integrative Oncology (SIO), NCCN, or ASCO integrative medicine guidelines
    • Institutional and cultural factors in Hungary reinforce mutual exclusivity between conventional and complementary medicine rather than integration
    • Hungary Medical Tourism Guide 2025 lists Hungary as destination for dental, cosmetic, and wellness tourism but not integrative oncology
    • Hungary has the highest cancer mortality rate in the EU (approximately 310 per 100,000 population), reflecting systemic healthcare capacity constraints that limit supportive/integrative services
    • No published clinical trials testing integrative oncology interventions (acupuncture, mindfulness for cancer distress) at Hungarian institutions identified for 2023-2025

    Read the full Hungary report →

  18. 18 Turkey TR 2.0/5 Poor Turkey receives a score of 2 (Poor) for integrative oncology quality. While the country excels in conventional cancer treatment with JCI-accredited facilities and multidisciplinary teams, integrative oncology services... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 10 cited points
    • Only one mainstream facility (Anadolu Medical Center) explicitly mentions a Complementary Medicine Centre, with minimal public information about specific services, evidence-based protocols, or practitioner qualifications
    • Major Turkish hospitals describe integrative therapy primarily as nutritional counseling and emotional support programs, not comprehensive complementary medicine services
    • No documentation of licensed acupuncturists with oncology training, certified oncology massage therapists, or structured mind-body medicine programs at major Turkish hospitals
    • No evidence Turkish hospitals follow internationally recognized integrative oncology guidelines such as Society for Integrative Oncology (SIO), NCCN, or ASCO protocols
    • Absence of documented systematic safety protocols for screening drug-supplement interactions or contraindications specific to integrative oncology
    • No evidence of board-certified integrative medicine physicians practicing in Turkey, nor any integrative oncology fellowship or training programs
    • Historical research (2002-2005) showed Turkish cancer patients obtained complementary and alternative medicine information from friends, media, and CAM vendors rather than healthcare providers
    • ChemoThermia clinic offers explicit integrative oncology with published research on metabolic therapies, but represents a specialized exception focused on metabolic approaches rather than traditional integrative oncology modalities
    • No systematic integrative oncology research or academic activity at Turkish medical centers, with a 2017 Ministry of Health workshop noting integrative oncology as an emerging field requiring development
    • While Turkey has excellent medical tourism infrastructure and cost advantages (50-70% lower than USA/Europe), integrative services specifically remain underdeveloped compared to leading centers in USA, Singapore, or Germany

    Read the full Turkey report →

  19. 19 Mexico MX 2.0/5 Poor Mexico merits a score of 2 (Poor) due to the absence of true evidence-based integrative oncology programs that combine conventional cancer treatment with complementary therapies under proper medical supervision. While... Full report
    The evidence behind this score 10 cited points
    • Instituto Nacional de Cancerología offers support specialties including psycho-oncology, nutritional oncology, pain medicine, and palliative care, but does not employ licensed acupuncturists, certified oncology massage therapists, or integrative medicine specialists [Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia - ESMO - 2024]
    • Leading private hospitals ABC Medical Center and Médica Sur provide psycho-oncology and nutrition counseling as part of comprehensive cancer care but lack evidence-based complementary modalities like acupuncture, massage, or structured mind-body programs [Cancer Center - ABC Medical Center - 2025]
    • Approximately 24 alternative cancer clinics operate in Tijuana offering complementary therapies, but these serve primarily as alternative primary treatments rather than integrated supportive care [Tijuana Cancer Clinics in the Post-NAFTA Era - Integrative Cancer Therapies - 2005]
    • Alternative therapists claim they can cure cancer with their treatments, but there is no scientific evidence that alternative therapies can treat people with cancer [Alternative cancer treatment clinics - Cancer Research UK - 2024]
    • Hope4Cancer founder received an M.D. from Autonomous University of Guadalajara then pursued advanced studies in naturopathic medicine at Trinity School of Natural Health, raising questions about appropriate oncology specialization [Hope4Cancer - 2025]
    • No systematic drug-supplement interaction screening protocols exist at Mexican institutions to prevent adverse interactions between chemotherapy and herbal/supplement therapies offered at alternative clinics
    • Mexico lacks national standards for integrating evidence-based complementary therapies into cancer care following Society for Integrative Oncology or NCCN integrative medicine guidelines
    • Only 6 of Mexico's 102 medical schools include instruction on palliative care, indicating minimal educational infrastructure for integrative oncology training [Mexico: Needless Suffering at End of Life - UICC - 2019]
    • While medical tourism infrastructure is well-developed for alternative cancer treatments, with median costs of US $45,000 for CAM treatment in Tijuana, this supports non-evidence-based therapies rather than coordinated integrative oncology [Crowdfunding for CAM Cancer Treatments - JMIR Cancer - 2024]
    • Crowdfunding campaigns for Tijuana CAM treatments spread problematic misinformation about treatment efficacy and leave many campaigners unable to afford desired treatments [Crowdfunding for CAM Cancer Treatments in Tijuana - PubMed - 2024]

    Read the full Mexico report →

Reading the field

What separates a good programme from a dangerous one

Every country above is graded against this published scale — the same 1–5 rubric for integrative oncology quality, top to bottom. How we score →

  1. 5/5 Excellent

    **Multiple world-class integrative oncology programs with international recognition:** - 3+ major cancer centers with accredited integrative oncology departments employing board-certified integrative medicine physicians - Programs follow Society for Integrative Oncology (SIO) clinical practice guidelines and evidence-based protocols - Comprehensive services including acupuncture (by licensed acupuncturists with oncology training), oncology massage therapy, mind-body medicine, oncology nutrition counseling, and additional modalities - Strong medical supervision with medical oncologist oversight and integrated care planning - Robust safety protocols including drug-supplement interaction screening and contraindication assessment - Active clinical research programs publishing in peer-reviewed journals - Academic training programs for healthcare providers in integrative oncology - Well-established medical tourism infrastructure with English-speaking staff and international patient coordination - Examples: USA (MD Anderson, Memorial Sloan Kettering, Dana-Farber integrative medicine programs), select European centers

  2. 4/5 Good

    **Established integrative oncology services at multiple institutions:** - 2-3 hospitals/cancer centers with formal integrative oncology programs or departments - Evidence-based approach with documented protocols for major symptoms (CINV, pain, anxiety, fatigue) - Core services available: acupuncture, nutritional counseling, mind-body programs, at minimum - Credentialed practitioners (licensed/certified) with some oncology-specific training - Medical oversight present though may not be integrated into all care decisions - Safety screening for drug-supplement interactions implemented - Some research activity or participation in clinical trials - Services accessible to international patients with language support available - Examples: Singapore (National Cancer Centre integrative programs), Germany (select university hospitals), Thailand (top medical tourism hospitals)

  3. 3/5 Moderate

    **Basic integrative services available but limited coordination:** - 1-2 facilities offering some complementary therapies within cancer care settings - Services available but may not be fully integrated into conventional treatment protocols - Limited range of modalities (perhaps acupuncture and nutrition counseling only) - Practitioners may have basic credentials but limited oncology-specific training - Medical supervision exists but integration with oncology teams is informal or inconsistent - Safety protocols basic or unclear - Little to no research activity - International patients may access services but infrastructure for medical tourists underdeveloped - Examples: Some facilities in Malaysia, UAE, selected Latin American hospitals

  4. 2/5 Poor

    **Minimal or poorly structured integrative services:** - Complementary therapies may be available but not specifically tailored for cancer patients or lack medical supervision - Services offered on an ad-hoc basis without formal protocols or integration - Practitioner qualifications unclear or inconsistent - No systematic safety screening or drug interaction protocols - No medical oncologist involvement in integrative care planning - No research or academic activity in integrative oncology - Medical tourism infrastructure for integrative services essentially absent - Examples: Countries with general alternative medicine availability but no cancer-specific integration

  5. 1/5 Very Poor / Unavailable

    **No integrative oncology programs or services:** - No formal complementary therapy services within cancer treatment settings - Complementary therapies may exist in the country but are not integrated with conventional cancer care - No medically-supervised programs combining conventional and complementary approaches - No trained practitioners in integrative oncology - Cancer patients seeking complementary therapies must do so outside the medical system without professional guidance - Examples: Countries with limited healthcare infrastructure or where complementary medicine is not legitimized within medical system

The reports

The full country reports under this lens

Each destination we have assessed has a full, cited report — the detailed analysis behind its score. The verdict is free; the report is the depth.

Clinics & providers

The clinics our research names

Named hospitals, clinics and centres cited across these findings — each carrying the specialties our reports record. Follow one to the reports behind it.

References

The sources behind these assessments

The distinct sources cited across these published reports — every finding carries its own citations; this is the union, each linking back to the reports that lean on it.

  1. Untitled source www.snuh.org/global/en/about/EN05006003.do Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in South Korea
  2. Untitled source acibademinternational.com/cancer-treatment-in-turkey-acibadems-multidisciplinary-oncology-team Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in Turkey
  3. Untitled source acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.3322/caac.21706 Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in United States
  4. Untitled source aiia.gov.in/specility-centre/center-for-integrative-oncologycio/facilities Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in India
  5. Untitled source akesisoncology.com/about-us/our-medical-team Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in Thailand
  6. Untitled source artofhealingcancer.com/unlocking-healing-power-ayurvedic-cancer-care-chikmagalur-karnataka-india Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in India
  7. Untitled source ascopost.com/issues/december-10-2022/2022-society-for-integrative-oncology-annual-international-conference Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in South Korea
  8. Untitled source ascopost.com/issues/may-25-2025/bringing-evidence-based-integrative-medicine-into-everyday-oncology-practice Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in United States
  9. Untitled source ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/EDBK_431554 Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in United States, Integrative Oncology Quality in India
  10. Untitled source ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.23.00857 Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in United States
  11. Untitled source ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JOP.18.00755 Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in United States
  12. Untitled source ashpublications.org/blood/article/138/Supplement%201/1887/480839/Integrative-Hematology-Oncology-Fellowship-Program Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in United States
  13. Untitled source ashpublications.org/blood/article/144/Supplement%201/3826/533903/Integrative-Hematology-Oncology-Fellowship-A Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in United States
  14. Untitled source asianhospital.in/medical-tourism-in-india-a-complete-guide-for-international-patients Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in India
  15. Untitled source ayurvaid.com/ss-avcio Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in India
  16. Untitled source ayurved-for-cancer.org/in/ictrc Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in India
  17. Untitled source brio-medical.com/cancer-treatment-mexico Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in Mexico
  18. Untitled source cancer.jmir.org/2024/1/e52018 Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in Mexico
  19. Untitled source cancercenter.arizona.edu/integrative-medicine-hematology-oncology-fellowship-program Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in United States
  20. Untitled source cancerchoices.org/resources/cancer-handbooks/how-to-integrate-your-choices/cancer-centers Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in United States, Integrative Oncology Quality in India
  21. Untitled source cancerchoices.org/resources/cancer-handbooks/how-to-integrate-your-choices/integrative-oncology-programs-and-expert-guidelines Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in United States
  22. Untitled source careerhospital.in/blog/medical-tourism-in-india-heal-in-india Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in India
  23. Untitled source ccctim.charite.de/en/hochschulambulanz Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in Germany
  24. Untitled source centromedicoabc.com/en Cited in Integrative Oncology Quality in Mexico

Explore the source archive →

In plain language

Start exploring the knowledge base

The field's shorthand our reports use, sized by how often it comes up. Follow any term to its full entry and the reports that use it.

For readers weighing this decision

Ways to read the evidence

The verdict is always free. A membership opens the full analysis and every cited source — this specialty, the whole library, or everything for good.

  • One specialty · annual

    Alternative & Complementary Medicine

    $49.00 / year

    $49.00/year

    Every report in this specialty — full analysis and every cited source — as each is published.

    Take this specialty
  • Full library · annual

    The whole library

    $199.00 / year

    $199.00/year

    The complete evidence behind every finding in every specialty, while your decision is live.

    Take the full library

Prefer to pay per report? A single report is $29.00, yours to keep — browse the reports. The verdict is always free.